Ideas for Persona Research Using Quantitative User Analytics

What Are Personas and Why Should We Care?

Personas, commonly applied in human-computer interaction (HCI) (Cooper, 1999), design (Aoyama, 2007), and business domains such as marketing and sales (Salminen et al., 2018), are fictional depictions of end-users, patients, customers, or other groups of interest (Cooper, 1999). Personas are cited to have many benefits, at least the following persona benefits mentioned in the literature:

  • BENEFIT 1: Personas convey end-users’ needs and requirements (Aoyama, 2007).
  • BENEFIT 2: Personas alleviate decision-makers’ self-referential bias (Anvari et al., 2019).
  • BENEFIT 3: Personas enable thinking of end-users even when none are physically present (Pruitt & Grudin, 2003).
  • BENEFIT 4: Personas give a human face to analytics data (Jansen et al., 2020; S.-G. Jung et al., 2020),
  • BENEFIT 5: Personas humanize nameless and faceless customer segments (Chapman et al., 2008).
  • BENEFIT 6: Personas give inspiration for design and other creative tasks (Nielsen, 2019).
  • BENEFIT 7: Personas help compare end-users (S. Jung et al., 2019), facilitating the discovery of key differences among the user base and the prioritization of end-user needs for system development (Qian et al., 2021).

Persona profiles show relevant information about end-users or customers (Nielsen et al., 2015). From a marketing perspective, personas aim to increase organizational performance via a heightened level of market orientation (Han et al., 1998), described also as user-centric design (Salminen, Şengün, et al., 2021).

For managers and other stakeholders dealing with customer-centric decision making, personas are easily digestible snapshots of end-users, audiences, or customers that can be used for decision making about product development, targeting, and needs prioritization.

Essential Concepts Relating to Quantitative Personas

This post discusses how personas can be effectively combined with the concept of analytics, i.e., the use of end-user data for drawing insights into human factors (Moran, 1981). We start by defining the key concepts, and we then explain our approach to infusing personas with user analytics, which we denote as Persona Analytics (PA). First, we are listing some crucial concepts.

  • Persona Analytics. In prior research (S. Jung et al., 2021a, 2021b), PA is defined as the systematic measurement of behaviors and interactions of persona users engaged with interactive persona systems; it refers to how researchers investigate the behaviors of persona users. In turn, examining persona users’ engagement with personas can generate vital insights for persona science and the design of personas and persona systems that better serve stakeholders’ information needs about end-users or customers. We refer to users when we mean stakeholders that use personas for decision making (e.g., designers, software developers, marketers). For other terminology, we refer to end-users when we mean people who personas portray.
  • Data-Driven Personas. Personas are increasingly being enriched with quantitative data (Salminen, Guan, Jung, et al., 2020), and their creation is partially or completely carried out by algorithmic processes, which is referred to as data-driven persona development (McGinn & Kotamraju, 2008). When using quantitative data for creating personas, the personas approach other analytics systems. Although quantitative personas were first created within software requirements engineering (Aoyama, 2005, 2007), the concept of data-driven personas was introduced by McGinn and Kotamraju (McGinn & Kotamraju, 2008) and later deployed by others (Kolbeinsson et al., 2021; Korsgaard et al., 2020; Miaskiewicz & Luxmoore, 2017; Spiliotopoulos et al., 2020; Watanabe et al., 2017). While data orientation has remained a consistent theme in the literature [16,17,32,9,10,50,51], three trends contribute to the rise of algorithmically generated personas (Jansen et al., 2020; Salminen, Guan, Jung, et al., 2020): (1) availability of user and customer data from online analytics and social media platforms; (2) democratization of data science tools and algorithms that enable automated persona generation; and (3) web technologies that remove the limitations of static personas via interactive user interfaces. These trends denote a shift from “flat file” personas into dynamic “full-stack personas” that update automatically and are traceable to individual user-level data (Jansen et al., 2020).
  • Interactive Persona Systems. Interactive persona systems (An, Kwak, Salminen, et al., 2018; Mijač et al., 2018; Salminen, Guan, Jung, et al., 2020) are interactive user interfaces (UI) that display persona profiles. This UI can, but not necessarily always, be accessed via web browsers (S. Jung et al., 2017, 2018; S.-G. Jung et al., 2018, 2020). The benefits of web technologies are their broad applicability and accessibility. Personas served via the web can be accessed using any device that supports web browsing. Supporting technologies, such as user account management, can be integrated with relative ease using standard libraries and best practices. Interactivity refers to users performing various actions on the personas, such as analyzing information on gender distributions, refreshing the persona quotes, filtering the quotes by sentiment and topic (Salminen, Jung, & Jansen, 2020), predicting a persona’s interest for a given topic (An, Kwak, Jung, et al., 2018; An, Kwak, Salminen, et al., 2018), and engaging in dialogue (J. Li et al., 2017; Liao & He, 2020).

Call for Persona Science

Persona research needs a strong empirical orientation to produce knowledge that is believable and can truly expand the boundaries of personas practice and theory and add to a coherent understanding of the persona user.

Advocates of the scientific method in persona research (Anvari et al., 2015, 2017; Chapman et al., 2008; Chapman & Milham, 2006; Grudin, 2006) have continuously mentioned the lack of empirical experiments and quantitative measurements as a bottleneck for progress in terms of theory and practice. To this end, persona science deals with real user behavior and formulating theories that are relevant to the design of personas.

The focus in these efforts lies in the study of the persona users, which is achieved by measuring user behavior of persona users. Therefore, persona science relies on the use of empirical scientific methods, such as experiments, to produce robust and generalizable information about persona creation, evaluation, use, and impact.

Carrying out persona science implies not only collecting data and conducting research on personas but also devising theories that explain the data and guide further data collection.  In practice, PA can assist in designing layouts, features, and information content in persona profiles. To achieve these benefits, it is necessary to incorporate analytics into personas, so that the interaction between the users and can be recorded.

Examples Variables to Study

Persona science necessitates progress on all fronts, eyeing on long-term theory formulation but also investing in short-term returns through the use of empirical methods. Persona science can contribute to a much-needed transition beyond the general claims that “personas work” or “personas do not work”, or the repetition of their “benefits” and “problems,” into systematically examining the conditions where the effects emerge.

Many human factors have not been investigated in persona studies. Based on case studies, variables of special interest include at least the following:

  • User’s level of experience (Salminen, Jung, Santos, et al., 2020),
  • Task type that personas assist in carrying out (Anvari et al., 2015),
  • Job role of the person using the personas (Nielsen et al., 2017), and
  • Culture of the organization employing the personas (Nielsen, 2010).

Investigation of combination of these human factors would be based on specific research objectives. First, the effect of users’ experience with personas on behaviors; this tends to be reported in persona studies but not included as a variable. How does novice persona users’ use of personas differ from more experienced users? Can the behaviors of more experienced users be used for guiding the novice users to learn to use personas more efficiently?

Moreover, task type of persona deployment is often reported but rarely varied or controlled – most typically, only one task type is deployed and in only one empirical setting, without repetition to achieve robustness. As a result, we do not know what kind of personas are ideal for the various task types and if users approach the personas differently based on the task type.

Similarly, comparison among different job roles and organizational units are rarely conducted, even though it is common sense that a person’s job position would greatly affect how they use personas to support their work. Studies tend to mention “designers” but looking deeper into these users’ job positions, it is revealed that they work in multiple departments, have multiple different perspectives to the end-user, and require much different information for their decision making.

Overall, systematic analysis of these variables in experimental studies can produce long-lasting, consistent, and robust knowledge on personas and their users, extending the scientific boundaries and impact of persona research.

Finally, there is evidence on cultural effects related to personas use (Salminen, Jung, Santos, et al., 2021), but there is no adequate understanding of how the cultural match between the shown personas and the users mediate the interaction and whether personas themselves can help bridge cultural gaps for design.

Contributions to Interactive Persona Systems and Human-Computer Interaction

Scientific developments in data-driven personas and interactive persona systems have been described as transformational (Mijač et al., 2018), multiple opportunities for using personas independently or as parts of intelligent systems can be envisioned. We highlight five such opportunities for system development around persona analytics.

  1. Interaction techniques and multimedia (e.g., persona chat/dialogue systems (Chu et al., 2018), video, AI agents (Salminen, Rao, Jung, et al., 2020)…) could be incorporated into persona systems to serve various end-user needs (Salminen, Jansen, An, et al., 2019).
  2. New techniques for comparing personas by design goal metrics, such as diversity (Salminen et al., 2018) and inclusivity (Goodman-Deane et al., 2018), could be added.
  3. Integrations into an external systems to enable persona-based recommendations (T. Li et al., 2019), content management, and customer relationship management, as well as facilitating online advertising (Salminen, Jung, & Jansen, 2019) via application programming interfaces (APIs) (S. Jung et al., 2018).
  4. Providing explainability, transparency, and context, which are important when applying algorithms for persona creation (Salminen, Jung, & Jansen, 2020; Salminen, Santos, Jung, et al., 2019).
  5. Using interactive systems can be used to drill down to the persona information and make quantitative predictions (An, Kwak, Salminen, et al., 2018).


While technology introduces novel opportunities for user-to-persona interaction, at the same time, these trends create an opportunity for better understanding of how persona users, such as designers, software developers, and marketers interact with personas. This better understanding of persona user behavior can lead to substantial advances in persona science (i.e., the academic study of personas and their usage), but it requires effective implementation of measurement.

The lack of empirical persona user research has been noted in academic literature (Marsden & Haag, 2016; Salminen, Guan, Jung, et al., 2020; Salminen, Jung, Chhirang, et al., 2021). The unifying factor behind these possibilities is the need for understanding the persona user behavior towards rigorous empirical discoveries, which requires measurement of engagement and interactions with personas. This capability is provided by PA.


An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Customer segmentation using online platforms: Isolating behavioral and demographic segments for persona creation via aggregated user data. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8(1), 54.

An, J., Kwak, H., Salminen, J., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Imaginary People Representing Real Numbers: Generating Personas from Online Social Media Data. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 12(4), 27.

Anvari, F., Richards, D., Hitchens, M., & Babar, M. A. (2015). Effectiveness of Persona with Personality Traits on Conceptual Design. 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, 2, 263–272.

Anvari, F., Richards, D., Hitchens, M., Babar, M. A., Tran, H. M. T., & Busch, P. (2017). An empirical investigation of the influence of persona with personality traits on conceptual design. Journal of Systems and Software, 134, 324–339.

Anvari, F., Richards, D., Hitchens, M., & Tran, H. M. T. (2019). Teaching User Centered Conceptual Design Using Cross-Cultural Personas and Peer Reviews for a Large Cohort of Students. 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), 62–73.

Aoyama, M. (2005). Persona-and-scenario based requirements engineering for software embedded in digital consumer products. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE’05), 85–94.

Aoyama, M. (2007). Persona-Scenario-Goal Methodology for User-Centered Requirements Engineering. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007), 185–194.

Chapman, C., Love, E., Milham, R. P., ElRif, P., & Alford, J. L. (2008). Quantitative Evaluation of Personas as Information. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 1107–1111.

Chapman, C., & Milham, R. P. (2006). The Personas’ New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 634–636.

Chu, E., Vijayaraghavan, P., & Roy, D. (2018). Learning Personas from Dialogue with Attentive Memory Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2638–2646.

Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (1 edition). Sams – Pearson Education.

Goodman-Deane, J., Waller, S., Demin, D., González-de-Heredia, A., Bradley, M., & Clarkson, J. P. (2018, June 28). Evaluating Inclusivity using Quantitative Personas. In the Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference 2018.

Grudin, J. (2006). Why Personas Work: The Psychological Evidence. In J. Pruitt & T. Adlin (Eds.), The Persona Lifecycle (pp. 642–663). Elsevier.

Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. Proceedings of Participation and Design Conference (PDC2002), 8.

Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? The Journal of Marketing, 30–45.

Jansen, B. J., Salminen, J., & Jung, S. (2020). Data-Driven Personas for Enhanced User Understanding: Combining Empathy with Rationality for Better Insights to Analytics. Data and Information Management, 4(1), 1–17.

Jung, S., An, J., Kwak, H., Ahmad, M., Nielsen, L., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Persona Generation from Aggregated Social Media Data. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1748–1755.

Jung, S., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2019). Personas Changing Over Time: Analyzing Variations of Data-Driven Personas During a Two-Year Period. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI EA ’19, 1–6.

Jung, S., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2021a). Implementing Eye-Tracking for Persona Analytics. ETRA ’21 Adjunct: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, 1–4.

Jung, S., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2021b). Persona Analytics: Implementing Mouse-tracking for an Interactive Persona System. Extended Abstracts of ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI EA ’21.

Jung, S., Salminen, J., Kwak, H., An, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Automatic Persona Generation (APG): A Rationale and Demonstration. CHIIR ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval, 321–324.

Jung, S.-G., Salminen, J., An, J., Kwak, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Automatically Conceptualizing Social Media Analytics Data via Personas. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018), 2.

Jung, S.-G., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). Giving Faces to Data: Creating Data-Driven Personas from Personified Big Data. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, 132–133.

Kolbeinsson, A., Brolin, E., & Lindblom, J. (2021). Data-Driven Personas: Expanding DHM for a Holistic Approach. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 296–303.

Korsgaard, D., Bjørner, T., Sørensen, P. K., & Burelli, P. (2020). Creating user stereotypes for persona development from qualitative data through semi-automatic subspace clustering. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 30(1), 81–125.

Li, J., Zhou, M. X., Yang, H., & Mark, G. (2017). Confiding in and listening to virtual agents: The effect of personality. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 275–286.

Li, T., Convertino, G., Tayi, R. K., & Kazerooni, S. (2019). What data should i protect? Recommender and planning support for data security analysts. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 286–297.

Liao, Y., & He, J. (2020). Racial mirroring effects on human-agent interaction in psychotherapeutic conversations. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 430–442.

Marsden, N., & Haag, M. (2016). Stereotypes and politics: Reflections on personas. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4017–4031.

McGinn, J. J., & Kotamraju, N. (2008). Data-driven persona development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1521–1524.

Miaskiewicz, T., & Luxmoore, C. (2017). The Use of Data-Driven Personas to Facilitate Organizational Adoption–A Case Study. The Design Journal, 20(3), 357–374.

Mijač, T., Jadrić, M., & Ćukušić, M. (2018). The potential and issues in data-driven development of web personas. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 1237–1242.

Moran, T. P. (1981). Guest Editor’s Introduction: An Applied Psychology of the User. ACM Computing Surveys, 13(1), 1–11.

Nielsen, L. (2010). Personas in Cross-Cultural Projects. In D. Katre, R. Orngreen, P. Yammiyavar, & T. Clemmensen (Eds.), Human Work Interaction Design: Usability in Social, Cultural and Organizational Contexts (Vol. 316, pp. 76–82). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Nielsen, L. (2019). Personas—User Focused Design (2nd ed. 2019 edition). Springer.

Nielsen, L., Hansen, K. S., Stage, J., & Billestrup, J. (2015). A Template for Design Personas: Analysis of 47 Persona Descriptions from Danish Industries and Organizations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 7(1), 45–61.

Nielsen, L., Jung, S., An, J., Salminen, J., Kwak, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Who Are Your Users?: Comparing Media Professionals’ Preconception of Users to Data-driven Personas. Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 602–606.

Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and Theory. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, 1–15.

Qian, K., Danilevsky, M., Katsis, Y., Kawas, B., Oduor, E., Popa, L., & Li, Y. (2021). XNLP: A Living Survey for XAI Research in Natural Language Processing. 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 78–80.

Salminen, J., Guan, K., Jung, S., Chowdhury, S. A., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). A Literature Review of Quantitative Persona Creation. CHI ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.

Salminen, J., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Kwak, H., & Jung, S. (2018). Are personas done? Evaluating their usefulness in the age of digital analytics. Persona Studies, 4(2), 47–65.

Salminen, J., Jansen, B. J., An, J., Kwak, H., & Jung, S. (2019). Automatic Persona Generation for Online Content Creators: Conceptual Rationale and a Research Agenda. In L. Nielsen (Ed.), Personas—User Focused Design (2nd ed., pp. 135–160). Springer London.

Salminen, J., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2019). The future of data-driven personas: A marriage of online analytics numbers and human attributes. ICEIS 2019 – Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 596–603.

Salminen, J., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). Explaining Data-Driven Personas. Proceedings of the Workshop on Explainable Smart Systems for Algorithmic Transparency in Emerging Technologies Co-Located with 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2020), 7.

Salminen, J., Jung, S., Santos, J. M., Chowdhury, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). The Effect of Experience on Persona Perceptions. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1–9.

Salminen, J., Jung, S., Santos, J. M., Kamel, A. M., & Jansen, B. J. (2021). Picturing It!: The Effect of Image Styles on User Perceptions of Personas. Proceedings of ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’21), 1–6.

Salminen, J., Jung, S.-G., Chhirang, K., & Jansen, B. J. (2021). Instilling Knowledge Claims of Personas from 346 Research Articles. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery.

Salminen, J., Rao, R. G., Jung, S., Chowdhury, S. A., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). Enriching Social Media Personas with Personality Traits: A Deep Learning Approach Using the Big Five Classes. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 101–120.

Salminen, J., Santos, J. M., Jung, S., Eslami, M., & Jansen, B. J. (2019). Persona Transparency: Analyzing the Impact of Explanations on Perceptions of Data-Driven Personas. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–13.

Salminen, J., Þengün, S., Jung, S.-G., & Jansen, B. J. (2021). Comparing Persona Analytics and Social Media Analytics for a User-Centric Task Using Eye-Tracking and Think-Aloud. CHItaly 2021: 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter, 1–8.

Spiliotopoulos, D., Margaris, D., & Vassilakis, C. (2020). Data-Assisted Persona Construction Using Social Media Data. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(3), Article 3.

Watanabe, Y., Washizaki, H., Honda, K., Noyori, Y., Fukazawa, Y., Morizuki, A., Shibata, H., Ogawa, K., Ishigaki, M., Shiizaki, S., Yamaguchi, T., & Yagi, T. (2017). ID3P: Iterative Data-driven Development of Persona Based on Quantitative Evaluation and Revision. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, 49–55.

Zhang, X., Brown, H.-F., & Shankar, A. (2016). Data-driven Personas: Constructing Archetypal Users with Clickstreams and User Telemetry. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5350–5359.

Zhu, H., Wang, H., & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Creating Persona Skeletons from Imbalanced Datasets—A Case Study using U.S. Older Adults’ Health Data. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference  – DIS ’19, 61–70.

Scroll to Top